I think there’s something wrong with me. Either I read too much BBC news or else I’m just plain out of step with the world. On the basis of what I read (on the BBC news) all those convicted of a crime, any crime, large or small, I’m not in a discriminating mood, should be sentenced to death. I mean, what’s the point of living following a criminal conviction if you are barred from working.
Yes, I’ve just read Viewpoints: Should Prisoners Have Jobs? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23781988 not to be confused with Prisoners “must work harder” for TVs also on the BBC site. In a contradictory conundrum, Prisoners must only work hard enough to earn the right to watch telly, but not too hard to help pay a mortgage. The article repeated Ken Clarke’s statement that “prisoners should work 40-hour weeks while serving time” so just how does this latest argument stack up.
Paul Nowak, assistant general secretary of the Trades Union Congress hauls out the nice shiny chestnuts: “We cannot have a situation where young people are unable to find a job because work is being done in a nearby prison for a fraction of the cost”. Brenda, punch me in the face. Fraction of the cost. Don’t know how good at maths you are, but have a little think. How much do you think it would cost to construct a working, call centre, within prison grounds? How much to police it – I mean putting in safeguards to ensure those working in it are not abusing the system. How much to guard the facility, to bus in those in charge. How many hours do you think a serving offender is actually allowed to work in one day – I’m telling you, it’s not 9am to 5.30. And can I just remind you (again) that 40% of a prisoner’s wages go to the Victim’s Support fund. What a lazy, lazy argument.
No, you are right, Paul, “Unscrupulous employers must not be allowed to exploit prison labour and transfer employment from our communities into prisons”. But heck, Paul, do you know how long it takes to establish an employment opportunity inside a prison, what hoops you have to jump through, the time spent waiting for government ministers to approve the idea – that’s before you’ve even invested in a structure safe enough to house your equipment. And how brave of the TUC for not signing up to the government’s Code of Practice on Work in Prisons – what a fearless bunch they are.
Frances Crook gives us a much more balanced argument citing the importance of ex-offenders (especially those who have committed less serious crimes) being given “community sentences and free up resources to ensure those left inside get the support they need to turn their lives around”.
Oh Peter, Peter Cuthbertson, director of the Centre for Crime Prevention, you naughty boy you. How could you word your thoughts so sloppily “for too long prisoners have spent a lot of their time in cushy idleness….” and, here’s a bit of icing on your cake of platitude “a lot of people will find it creepy that the cold-calls they receive could be coming from a prison”. I can imagine it now, sat in the comfort of my front room. The phone rings.
Caller: “I’d like to sell you double glazing”.
Me: “Are you calling from inside a prison or inside a call centre?”
Caller: “what’s the difference”
Me: “i need to know your background as I’m not sure if i’m feeling threatened”.
Caller: “well, i’m a youngster, I go out at weekends and get totally rat-arsed and smoke cannabis, I’m paid a pittance and am unreasonable targeted to make a certain quantity of calls an hour, I exceed the speed limit and could one day mow someone down in a tragic accident, but thankfully that hasn’t yet happened. I can’t afford to insure my car on my pay, but no worries, I think i get away with that. I recently went on my holidays and smuggled too many fags back into the country and sometimes I work cash in hand but don’t tell the tax man”.
Me: “phew, I’d hate to think I was speaking to someone who had been caught defrauding the Inland Revenue. Now where were we with the double glazing offer?”
But finally, after I’d almost given up reading, Karen Steadman, researcher at The Work Foundation comes up with some hard statistics:
Research on ex-prisoners showed half were claiming an out-of-work benefit at 12 months after release, with nearly three quarters claiming within two years of leaving prison. Ex-offenders are often also unemployed for a longer period of time than other claimants.
Though the reasons for this are multiple, including social exclusion, stigma, lower levels of education and work experience, and gaps in work history, the result is too often the same – a return to criminality.
Karen raises an extremely important point that the majority on the ill-informed commentators on the story fail to pick up on. If Karen is correct, and, believe me she is, who do you think pays to support those on out-of-work benefit? You do you eejut. You might not like the idea, but surely it is better to get offenders – and also any long term unemployed person – into jobs to save us all money?